<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Realistic HDR photography Photoshop tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garmahis.com/tutorials/realistic-hdr-photography-photoshop-tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garmahis.com/tutorials/realistic-hdr-photography-photoshop-tutorial/</link>
	<description>tips, tuts, reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:55:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://garmahis.com/tutorials/realistic-hdr-photography-photoshop-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5833</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garmahis.com/?p=889#comment-5833</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... I seem to be missing something. In step 3, I can see Select-&gt;Modify and Select-&gt;Feather but no Select-&gt;Modify-&gt;Feather . So I tried Select-&gt;Feather, gave a Feather Radius 150-250px; this changes the selection. But what should I do with the selected portion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I seem to be missing something. In step 3, I can see Select-&gt;Modify and Select-&gt;Feather but no Select-&gt;Modify-&gt;Feather . So I tried Select-&gt;Feather, gave a Feather Radius 150-250px; this changes the selection. But what should I do with the selected portion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Buisse</title>
		<link>http://garmahis.com/tutorials/realistic-hdr-photography-photoshop-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5475</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Buisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garmahis.com/?p=889#comment-5475</guid>
		<description>Not a bad way to get started, but you are actually introducing a lot of halos (see for instance in the sky around the dome). What you are doing is fairly similar to how tonemapping software works behind the scenes, except that they have a lot more tweaking possibilities. While I agree that the default photomatix look is crap, by using well chosen parameters *and* further processing in photoshop, it is possible to obtain a result better than both of your images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad way to get started, but you are actually introducing a lot of halos (see for instance in the sky around the dome). What you are doing is fairly similar to how tonemapping software works behind the scenes, except that they have a lot more tweaking possibilities. While I agree that the default photomatix look is crap, by using well chosen parameters *and* further processing in photoshop, it is possible to obtain a result better than both of your images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cream of Beats</title>
		<link>http://garmahis.com/tutorials/realistic-hdr-photography-photoshop-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>Cream of Beats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garmahis.com/?p=889#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>This is really FANTASTIC! I have photomatix but I&#039;m very pleased with these results! Can&#039;t wait to try this out with my own pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really FANTASTIC! I have photomatix but I&#8217;m very pleased with these results! Can&#8217;t wait to try this out with my own pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
